In an effort to arrive at which thou knowest now not, Thou needs to cross by way of a manner that thou knowest no longer. that allows you to arrive at that which thou possesses no longer. Thou needs to cross through a manner that thou possesses now not. in an effort to arrive at that which thou aren't, Thou needs to wade through that which thou paintings no longer. 30 In either Eliot’s passage and St. John’s, whatever that may be imagined (by the interior or outer senses or considered, or ritually recited) has not anything to do with the truth of God. fairly, as Paul Murray shows, Eliot’s “central and virtually unique difficulty, at this degree of the poem, is with the purification and negation of the inner lifetime of the spirit. ”31 In St. John’s unrelenting insistence on a complete self-emptying, Eliot well-known what he had previous famous within the Buddhist thinker Nagarjuna, who wrote: due to the fact there's no dharma no matter what originating independently, No dharma no matter what exists which isn't empty. He who's with out possessiveness and no ego—He, additionally, doesn't exist. . . . while I and mine have stopped, then additionally there isn't outer nor an internal self. 32 the line to realize knowledge, either Nagarjuna and St. John assert, needs to battle through the way in which of negation. The annihilation of self was once, for St. John, the foundational illumination: “this negation has to be just like a whole temporal, normal and non secular loss of life, that's, in connection with esteem of the need that is the resource of all denial. ”33 up to it is dependent upon brave goal and a prepared self-surrender into not-knowing, non secular death—dying earlier than dying—finally includes the freeing present of grace that reactivates the divine-human courting. it is vital, for that reason, to acknowledge that the single factor we personal is strictly that which we're so much unwilling to give up: the appearance of self. sincerely, Eliot’s paraphrase of St. John used to be no longer the occasion of a craft, yet spotting functional implications of his religion, the expression of which, after all, is laden through a less than excellent craft. The Wounded general practitioner (East Coker IV) After the landscape-inspired meditation of the 1st events of East Coker and the through negativa renunciation of the 3rd circulate, the fourth circulate casts Christ’s (and humankind’s) affliction in a seventeenth-century verse shape laced with metaphysical wit. Integrally hooked up to the inner quietude of the 3rd flow, the fourth circulate expresses a selfless appropriation of being nonetheless sooner than the Eucharistic secret. Eliot as soon as remarked that the fourth move of East Coker, a lyric revolving round the Christian subject matters of excellent Friday, represents “the center of the problem. ”34 in different places, in spite of the fact that, Eliot wrote that “the poem as a whole—this 5 half form—is an try and weave a number of rather unrelated strands jointly in an emotional complete, in order that rather there isn’t any middle of the problem” in any respect. 35 The word “emotional entire” clarifies the obvious contradiction among those statements: for Eliot, the sacramental “heart of the matter,” hinted at all through every one quartet, earnings expressive efficacy through advantage of unforeseen rhetorical and striking institutions.